Council, which I presume was the opinion of the Members when we sent our papers supporting your decision for dissenting. The papers which you transmitted to me did not show whether the case was connected by being cited. Who raised the important question of his previous convictions?
As I understand the case, this prisoner was convicted four times; his first conviction was 266 days ago when he gave his age as 21. His second conviction was 8 months later. On the third conviction, 6 months later, he stated his age as 21. On the fourth conviction, four months later, he was sentenced to be flogged. The first and fourth offences and the second and third were each for the same crime, and twice for die and twice for...
Council, which I pesime
испла
the opinion of
the Members
Wens ons
papers
समर्थत
Jour
for dissenting. The
which you
hansmitted
Lane
to one
not show
whether
the
by
Be Conne
isited
Who
прок
the
important question
pris meis aff.
y
the-
Ih
As
I understan
Case.
this pris
Convicted
4.
times;
his first conviction
266
he gave his age.
ALD
Confiction
До
his second.
8
mouths later
he
Elated.
his
at 21
کی کر
сафа
On the third
6 months later
gave
had age
ote as Wh
Le
422,
the same four
months later
fourth conviction: and he
Z As
Rentenced
flogger
the first and
offences and the fourth
to be
each for
die ond
twice for
4
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.